top of page

Course Title

ICS-300 Intermediate Incident Command System

ICS-300 training aligned with FEMA NIMS 2017, covering expanding incident management, Type 3 ICS structure, Unified Command, multi-jurisdictional coordination, IAP Forms 215 and 215A, and General Staff roles.

ICS-300  Intermediate Incident Command System Training Service in Saudi Arabia

ACCREDITATIONS

Clients

750+

Satisfied Clients

Our Clients

2025

Training Ratings Report

4.89 ★★★★★

Based on 2400+ Reviews

View Ratings Report

4.8 ★★★★★

Based on 1000+ Reviews

Check Reviews

SUCCESS PROOF IN NUMBERS

RESULTS-ORITNTED Training Description

Course Duration

3 Days

Training Delivery Method

Classroom (Instructor-Led) or Online (Instructor-Led)

Instructors Languages

English / Arabic / Urdu / Hindi / Pashto

Certification Provider

Tamkene Saudi Training Center - Approved by TVTC (Technical and Vocational Training Corporation)

Certificate Validity

2 Years (Extendable with additional training hours)

Course Average Passing Rate

97%

Competency Assessment Criteria

Practical Assessment and Knowledge Assessment

Post Training Reporting

Post Training Report + Candidate(s) Training Evaluation Forms

Training Design Methodology

ADDIE Training Design Methodology

Certificate of Successful Completion

Certification is provided upon successful completion. The certificate can be verified through a QR-Code system.

Course Overview

An initial action incident becomes an expanding incident when its scope, resource demands, or operational complexity exceed what a single supervisory level can manage within a single operational period. At that point, the ICS structure must scale — activating Command and General Staff positions, establishing Branches and Divisions, integrating mutual aid resources, coordinating with an Emergency Operations Center, and sustaining operations across multiple operational periods. The personnel who lead in those positions — Operations Section Chief, Planning Section Chief, Logistics Section Chief, Division Supervisor, Branch Director — require competency at a fundamentally different level than the initial action supervisor. ICS-300 develops that competency.


This training course builds directly on ICS-100 and ICS-200 to develop the intermediate ICS competency required of personnel who may serve in Command or General Staff positions — or as Division/Group Supervisors, Unit Leaders, or Branch Directors — during expanding incidents. The course is aligned with ICS-300: Intermediate Incident Command System for Expanding Incidents developed by the FEMA — Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management Institute — EMI under the NIMS — National Incident Management System 2017 Doctrine, coordinated with the National Wildfire Coordinating Group — NWCG, the US Department of Agriculture — USDA, the Environmental Protection Agency — EPA, and the US Coast Guard — USCG. ICS-300 is the mandatory prerequisite for ICS-400 and all NIMS All-Hazards position-specific Command and General Staff courses including E/L 950: All-Hazards Incident Commander, E/L 958: All-Hazards Operations Section Chief, and E/L 956: All-Hazards Liaison Officer. The course integrates ISO 45001:2018: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems and ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems, applying Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Risk Control — HIRARC and Root Cause Analysis — RCA throughout.

Key Learning Objectives

  • Describe how the NIMS Command and Management component supports expanding incident management

  • Implement the ICS management process for a simulated Type 3 expanding incident

  • Apply Unified Command for multi-jurisdictional and multi-agency expanding incidents

  • Develop incident objectives and a complete IAP for a multi-operational-period expanding incident

  • Complete ICS Form 215: Operational Planning Worksheet for a simulated expanding incident

  • Complete ICS Form 215A: Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis integrating hazard and risk assessment

  • Apply Command and General Staff roles — Operations, Planning, Logistics, and Finance/Administration — during an expanding incident

  • Manage resources across multiple operational periods including ordering, tracking, and demobilization

  • Coordinate with the Emergency Operations Center — EOC — and Multi-Agency Coordination System — MACS

  • Apply HIRARC to expanding incident hazard assessment within the ICS Safety function

Course Outline

Day 1 — Expanding Incident Concepts, Unified Command, and General Staff Roles

1. Introduction to ICS-300 and Expanding Incidents

1.1 Course Scope and Prerequisites
  • ICS-300 scope — intermediate ICS for Type 3 expanding incidents requiring full Command and General Staff activation

  • Mandatory prerequisites — ICS-100 and ICS-200 both required before attending ICS-300

  • ICS-300 as mandatory prerequisite for ICS-400 and all NIMS All-Hazards position-specific courses

  • Course developed with NWCG, USDA, EPA, and USCG per NIMS 2017 Doctrine

  • Minimum passing score — 75% on the final knowledge assessment

1.2 Expanding Incident Characteristics
  • Expanding incident — extends beyond the initial operational period and requires full ICS structure activation

  • Type 3 incident — requires regional resources, activates all Command and General Staff, and spans multiple operational periods

  • Incident complexity factors — life safety threat, resource requirements, political sensitivity, and media attention

  • Transition from initial action to expanding incident — recognizing when the ICS structure must scale up

  • Multi-operational period management — each period requires a new Planning P cycle and IAP

2. Unified Command for Expanding Incidents

2.1 Unified Command Structure
  • Unified Command — UC — used when multiple agencies share jurisdiction or functional authority over the incident

  • UC membership — senior officials from each agency with statutory authority, not just operational authority

  • UC single set of objectives — all UC members agree on one set of incident objectives before operations begin

  • Single Operations Section Chief — UC appoints one OSC to direct all tactical operations

  • UC decision-making process — consensus-based, with a defined process for resolving disagreement

  • UC documentation — a single IAP covers all agencies operating under UC

2.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Coordination
  • Single jurisdiction UC — multiple agencies within the same geographic jurisdiction with different functional authority

  • Multi-jurisdictional UC — agencies from different geographic jurisdictions responding to a shared incident

  • Agency Representative — assigned by each agency to advise the UC without decision-making authority

  • Liaison Officer role — coordinates with assisting and cooperating agency representatives

  • Jurisdictional authority retention — each agency retains its legal authority while cooperating under UC

  • UC meeting agenda — opening, situation briefing, objective setting, strategy selection, and IAP direction

3. Command and General Staff Roles in Expanding Incidents

3.1 Command Staff in Expanding Incidents
  • Safety Officer — develops the ICS Form 215A Safety Analysis for each operational period

  • Public Information Officer — manages the Joint Information Center — JIC — for multi-agency incidents

  • Liaison Officer — manages all agency representatives at the Incident Command Post — ICP

  • Deputy Incident Commander — supports the IC and is fully qualified to assume command

3.2 General Staff in Expanding Incidents
  • Operations Section Chief — directs all tactical resources and supervises Branches, Divisions, and Groups

  • Planning Section Chief — manages situation status, resource status, and IAP development

  • Logistics Section Chief — manages all support, communications, facilities, and supply

  • Finance/Administration Section Chief — tracks all incident costs and manages procurement

  • Branch Director — manages two or more Divisions or Groups when span of control requires

  • Division Supervisor — manages resources in a defined geographic area

  • Group Supervisor — manages resources performing a defined function across geographic areas

Day 2 — IAP Development, Planning Process, and Resource Management

4. Expanded ICS Planning Process

4.1 The Planning P for Expanding Incidents
  • Planning P in expanding incidents — cycles continuously, one full cycle per operational period

  • Initial UC or IC meeting — establishes the overarching incident priorities and objective framework

  • Tactics meeting — Operations Section Chief leads with Branch Directors and Division/Group Supervisors

  • Planning meeting — all Command and General Staff review the draft IAP before finalization

  • Operational briefing — all supervisors briefed on the complete IAP before each operational period

  • Time management — the Planning Section manages the planning cycle timeline to ensure IAP is ready before the next operational period

4.2 ICS Form 215 and 215A
  • ICS Form 215: Operational Planning Worksheet — documents tactics, resource assignments, and communications for each Division and Group

  • Form 215 completion — Operations Section Chief develops with input from Division/Group Supervisors

  • Form 215 columns — work assignment, resources needed, reporting location, requested arrival time, and special instructions

  • ICS Form 215A: Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis — identifies hazards and mitigations for each tactical assignment

  • Form 215A development — Safety Officer develops jointly with Operations during the tactics meeting

  • Form 215A content — hazard, risk rating, mitigation measure, and residual risk for each operational assignment

  • Form 215A integration into IAP — distributed to all supervisors as part of the operational period briefing package

5. Incident Action Plan for Expanding Incidents

  • Written IAP is mandatory for all expanding incidents with multiple operational periods

  • ICS Form 202 — Incident Objectives — updated for each operational period

  • ICS Form 203 — Organization Assignment List — updated as personnel rotate or positions change

  • ICS Form 204 — Assignment List — one form per Division or Group for the operational period

  • ICS Form 205 — Radio Communications Plan — updated when communications resources change

  • ICS Form 205A — Communications List — supplements the 205 with phone and contact information

  • ICS Form 206 — Medical Plan — updated as medical resources and hospital status change

  • ICS Form 207 — Incident Organization Chart — visual display of all activated ICS positions

  • ICS Form 208 — Safety Message/Plan — developed by Safety Officer from the Form 215A findings

  • IAP distribution — all supervisors receive the complete IAP before each operational period begins

6. Resource Management for Expanding Incidents

6.1 Resource Ordering and Tracking
  • Resource ordering process — all resource requests flow through the Logistics Section to the IC/UC for approval

  • Resource typing — national resource typing standards ensure mutual aid resources match the requested capability

  • Resource status tracking — Resources Unit tracks all resources as Available, Assigned, or Out-of-Service

  • Check-in recorder — all arriving resources check in before assignment to maintain accountability

  • Staging Area Manager — manages resources awaiting assignment near the incident

  • Resources Unit Leader — maintains the T-card or electronic resource tracking system throughout the incident

6.2 Demobilization Planning
  • Demobilization planning begins at the earliest possible point in the incident — not at the end

  • Demobilization Unit Leader — develops the Demobilization Plan per ICS Form 221

  • ICS Form 221: Demobilization Check-Out — ensures all resources are released systematically

  • Demobilization sequence — resources released in reverse order of criticality to ongoing operations

  • Finance/Administration coordination — cost documentation completed before resource release

7. EOC and MACS Coordination

  • Emergency Operations Center — EOC — supports the IC/UC from off-site without directing on-scene operations

  • EOC functions — resource coordination, inter-agency communication, policy decisions, and public information

  • IC/UC to EOC reporting — the IC/UC provides regular situation reports to the EOC

  • EOC to IC/UC support — the EOC provides resource requests fulfillment and removes obstacles

  • Multi-Agency Coordination System — MACS — the broader framework within which EOCs coordinate across jurisdictions

  • Liaison Officer interface — coordinates day-to-day communication between the ICP and the EOC

  • Policy-level decisions — escalated from the IC/UC to the EOC when they exceed the IC's delegation of authority

  • Joint Information Center — JIC — coordinates all public information across agencies at the EOC level

Day 3 — Logistics, Finance, Documentation, and Scenario Exercise

8. Logistics Section Operations

8.1 Service Branch
  • Communications Unit — develops and implements the Incident Communications Plan — ICS Form 205

  • Medical Unit — develops the Medical Plan — ICS Form 206 — and manages on-site medical care

  • Food Unit — provides meals to all incident personnel at scheduled intervals

8.2 Support Branch
  • Supply Unit — orders, receives, stores, and distributes all incident supplies and equipment

  • Facilities Unit — establishes and maintains the ICP, Base, Camps, and other incident facilities

  • Ground Support Unit — manages ground transportation and fueling for incident resources

  • Base — the primary logistics hub for personnel support, separated from the ICP

  • Camp — a secondary logistics facility for incidents covering a large geographic area

9. Finance and Administration Section Operations

  • Finance/Administration Section activation — required when incident costs are significant or reimbursement claims are anticipated

  • Time Unit — tracks all personnel hours for payroll and reimbursement purposes

  • Procurement Unit — manages contracts, equipment rental agreements, and emergency purchasing

  • Compensation and Claims Unit — manages injury claims and property damage claims arising from the incident

  • Cost Unit — tracks and projects total incident costs, providing daily cost summaries to the IC/UC

  • Cost documentation discipline — accurate documentation from the first operational period supports post-incident reimbursement

10. HSE and Quality Management Integration

  • ICS-300 as a workplace emergency management competency requirement per ISO 45001:2018 Clause 8.2

  • Applying HIRARC within the Safety Officer and Form 215A development process

  • Safety Officer authority to halt operations — applies to all personnel regardless of agency or rank

  • Incident documentation as a quality record per ISO 9001 — IAP, ICS forms, and activity logs

  • After-action review applying RCA — identifying command, coordination, and resource management failures

  • Corrective Action Plans per NIMS — structured improvements based on expanding incident lessons learned

  • Applying PDCA — Plan-Do-Check-Act to incident management capability improvement

11. Practical Scenario Exercise — Type 3 Expanding Incident

  • Participants manage a simulated Type 3 expanding incident across multiple operational periods

  • Exercise includes UC establishment, objective development, tactics meeting, and Form 215 completion

  • Form 215A Safety Analysis is completed by the Safety Officer role during the exercise

  • Full IAP is assembled and briefed before the simulated operational period begins

  • Resource ordering, tracking, and demobilization planning are practiced during the exercise

  • EOC coordination is simulated — IC/UC submits situation reports and receives resource support responses

  • Exercise debrief — after-action review applying RCA to command, planning, and coordination gaps identified

12. Case Studies and Group Discussions

  • Case studies from expanding incident management failures in Middle East oil and gas, industrial, and infrastructure environments including incidents where ICS failed to scale appropriately, EOC coordination was absent, and multiple operational periods were managed without a written IAP — and the importance of ICS-300 competency for Command and General Staff personnel

  • Group discussion on ICS-300 application challenges in regional environments including managing Type 3 incidents across multi-contractor GCC industrial sites, coordinating UC between government civil defense agencies and private sector operators during major petrochemical incidents, and sustaining IAP discipline across multiple operational periods under organizational pressure

  • Final knowledge assessment — 75% minimum passing score required for ICS-300 certification

Day 1 — Expanding Incident Concepts, Unified Command, and General Staff Roles

1. Introduction to ICS-300 and Expanding Incidents

1.1 Course Scope and Prerequisites
  • ICS-300 scope — intermediate ICS for Type 3 expanding incidents requiring full Command and General Staff activation

  • Mandatory prerequisites — ICS-100 and ICS-200 both required before attending ICS-300

  • ICS-300 as mandatory prerequisite for ICS-400 and all NIMS All-Hazards position-specific courses

  • Course developed with NWCG, USDA, EPA, and USCG per NIMS 2017 Doctrine

  • Minimum passing score — 75% on the final knowledge assessment

1.2 Expanding Incident Characteristics
  • Expanding incident — extends beyond the initial operational period and requires full ICS structure activation

  • Type 3 incident — requires regional resources, activates all Command and General Staff, and spans multiple operational periods

  • Incident complexity factors — life safety threat, resource requirements, political sensitivity, and media attention

  • Transition from initial action to expanding incident — recognizing when the ICS structure must scale up

  • Multi-operational period management — each period requires a new Planning P cycle and IAP

2. Unified Command for Expanding Incidents

2.1 Unified Command Structure
  • Unified Command — UC — used when multiple agencies share jurisdiction or functional authority over the incident

  • UC membership — senior officials from each agency with statutory authority, not just operational authority

  • UC single set of objectives — all UC members agree on one set of incident objectives before operations begin

  • Single Operations Section Chief — UC appoints one OSC to direct all tactical operations

  • UC decision-making process — consensus-based, with a defined process for resolving disagreement

  • UC documentation — a single IAP covers all agencies operating under UC

2.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Coordination
  • Single jurisdiction UC — multiple agencies within the same geographic jurisdiction with different functional authority

  • Multi-jurisdictional UC — agencies from different geographic jurisdictions responding to a shared incident

  • Agency Representative — assigned by each agency to advise the UC without decision-making authority

  • Liaison Officer role — coordinates with assisting and cooperating agency representatives

  • Jurisdictional authority retention — each agency retains its legal authority while cooperating under UC

  • UC meeting agenda — opening, situation briefing, objective setting, strategy selection, and IAP direction

3. Command and General Staff Roles in Expanding Incidents

3.1 Command Staff in Expanding Incidents
  • Safety Officer — develops the ICS Form 215A Safety Analysis for each operational period

  • Public Information Officer — manages the Joint Information Center — JIC — for multi-agency incidents

  • Liaison Officer — manages all agency representatives at the Incident Command Post — ICP

  • Deputy Incident Commander — supports the IC and is fully qualified to assume command

3.2 General Staff in Expanding Incidents
  • Operations Section Chief — directs all tactical resources and supervises Branches, Divisions, and Groups

  • Planning Section Chief — manages situation status, resource status, and IAP development

  • Logistics Section Chief — manages all support, communications, facilities, and supply

  • Finance/Administration Section Chief — tracks all incident costs and manages procurement

  • Branch Director — manages two or more Divisions or Groups when span of control requires

  • Division Supervisor — manages resources in a defined geographic area

  • Group Supervisor — manages resources performing a defined function across geographic areas

Day 2 — IAP Development, Planning Process, and Resource Management

4. Expanded ICS Planning Process

4.1 The Planning P for Expanding Incidents
  • Planning P in expanding incidents — cycles continuously, one full cycle per operational period

  • Initial UC or IC meeting — establishes the overarching incident priorities and objective framework

  • Tactics meeting — Operations Section Chief leads with Branch Directors and Division/Group Supervisors

  • Planning meeting — all Command and General Staff review the draft IAP before finalization

  • Operational briefing — all supervisors briefed on the complete IAP before each operational period

  • Time management — the Planning Section manages the planning cycle timeline to ensure IAP is ready before the next operational period

4.2 ICS Form 215 and 215A
  • ICS Form 215: Operational Planning Worksheet — documents tactics, resource assignments, and communications for each Division and Group

  • Form 215 completion — Operations Section Chief develops with input from Division/Group Supervisors

  • Form 215 columns — work assignment, resources needed, reporting location, requested arrival time, and special instructions

  • ICS Form 215A: Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis — identifies hazards and mitigations for each tactical assignment

  • Form 215A development — Safety Officer develops jointly with Operations during the tactics meeting

  • Form 215A content — hazard, risk rating, mitigation measure, and residual risk for each operational assignment

  • Form 215A integration into IAP — distributed to all supervisors as part of the operational period briefing package

5. Incident Action Plan for Expanding Incidents

  • Written IAP is mandatory for all expanding incidents with multiple operational periods

  • ICS Form 202 — Incident Objectives — updated for each operational period

  • ICS Form 203 — Organization Assignment List — updated as personnel rotate or positions change

  • ICS Form 204 — Assignment List — one form per Division or Group for the operational period

  • ICS Form 205 — Radio Communications Plan — updated when communications resources change

  • ICS Form 205A — Communications List — supplements the 205 with phone and contact information

  • ICS Form 206 — Medical Plan — updated as medical resources and hospital status change

  • ICS Form 207 — Incident Organization Chart — visual display of all activated ICS positions

  • ICS Form 208 — Safety Message/Plan — developed by Safety Officer from the Form 215A findings

  • IAP distribution — all supervisors receive the complete IAP before each operational period begins

6. Resource Management for Expanding Incidents

6.1 Resource Ordering and Tracking
  • Resource ordering process — all resource requests flow through the Logistics Section to the IC/UC for approval

  • Resource typing — national resource typing standards ensure mutual aid resources match the requested capability

  • Resource status tracking — Resources Unit tracks all resources as Available, Assigned, or Out-of-Service

  • Check-in recorder — all arriving resources check in before assignment to maintain accountability

  • Staging Area Manager — manages resources awaiting assignment near the incident

  • Resources Unit Leader — maintains the T-card or electronic resource tracking system throughout the incident

6.2 Demobilization Planning
  • Demobilization planning begins at the earliest possible point in the incident — not at the end

  • Demobilization Unit Leader — develops the Demobilization Plan per ICS Form 221

  • ICS Form 221: Demobilization Check-Out — ensures all resources are released systematically

  • Demobilization sequence — resources released in reverse order of criticality to ongoing operations

  • Finance/Administration coordination — cost documentation completed before resource release

7. EOC and MACS Coordination

  • Emergency Operations Center — EOC — supports the IC/UC from off-site without directing on-scene operations

  • EOC functions — resource coordination, inter-agency communication, policy decisions, and public information

  • IC/UC to EOC reporting — the IC/UC provides regular situation reports to the EOC

  • EOC to IC/UC support — the EOC provides resource requests fulfillment and removes obstacles

  • Multi-Agency Coordination System — MACS — the broader framework within which EOCs coordinate across jurisdictions

  • Liaison Officer interface — coordinates day-to-day communication between the ICP and the EOC

  • Policy-level decisions — escalated from the IC/UC to the EOC when they exceed the IC's delegation of authority

  • Joint Information Center — JIC — coordinates all public information across agencies at the EOC level

Day 3 — Logistics, Finance, Documentation, and Scenario Exercise

8. Logistics Section Operations

8.1 Service Branch
  • Communications Unit — develops and implements the Incident Communications Plan — ICS Form 205

  • Medical Unit — develops the Medical Plan — ICS Form 206 — and manages on-site medical care

  • Food Unit — provides meals to all incident personnel at scheduled intervals

8.2 Support Branch
  • Supply Unit — orders, receives, stores, and distributes all incident supplies and equipment

  • Facilities Unit — establishes and maintains the ICP, Base, Camps, and other incident facilities

  • Ground Support Unit — manages ground transportation and fueling for incident resources

  • Base — the primary logistics hub for personnel support, separated from the ICP

  • Camp — a secondary logistics facility for incidents covering a large geographic area

9. Finance and Administration Section Operations

  • Finance/Administration Section activation — required when incident costs are significant or reimbursement claims are anticipated

  • Time Unit — tracks all personnel hours for payroll and reimbursement purposes

  • Procurement Unit — manages contracts, equipment rental agreements, and emergency purchasing

  • Compensation and Claims Unit — manages injury claims and property damage claims arising from the incident

  • Cost Unit — tracks and projects total incident costs, providing daily cost summaries to the IC/UC

  • Cost documentation discipline — accurate documentation from the first operational period supports post-incident reimbursement

10. HSE and Quality Management Integration

  • ICS-300 as a workplace emergency management competency requirement per ISO 45001:2018 Clause 8.2

  • Applying HIRARC within the Safety Officer and Form 215A development process

  • Safety Officer authority to halt operations — applies to all personnel regardless of agency or rank

  • Incident documentation as a quality record per ISO 9001 — IAP, ICS forms, and activity logs

  • After-action review applying RCA — identifying command, coordination, and resource management failures

  • Corrective Action Plans per NIMS — structured improvements based on expanding incident lessons learned

  • Applying PDCA — Plan-Do-Check-Act to incident management capability improvement

11. Practical Scenario Exercise — Type 3 Expanding Incident

  • Participants manage a simulated Type 3 expanding incident across multiple operational periods

  • Exercise includes UC establishment, objective development, tactics meeting, and Form 215 completion

  • Form 215A Safety Analysis is completed by the Safety Officer role during the exercise

  • Full IAP is assembled and briefed before the simulated operational period begins

  • Resource ordering, tracking, and demobilization planning are practiced during the exercise

  • EOC coordination is simulated — IC/UC submits situation reports and receives resource support responses

  • Exercise debrief — after-action review applying RCA to command, planning, and coordination gaps identified

12. Case Studies and Group Discussions

  • Case studies from expanding incident management failures in Middle East oil and gas, industrial, and infrastructure environments including incidents where ICS failed to scale appropriately, EOC coordination was absent, and multiple operational periods were managed without a written IAP — and the importance of ICS-300 competency for Command and General Staff personnel

  • Group discussion on ICS-300 application challenges in regional environments including managing Type 3 incidents across multi-contractor GCC industrial sites, coordinating UC between government civil defense agencies and private sector operators during major petrochemical incidents, and sustaining IAP discipline across multiple operational periods under organizational pressure

  • Final knowledge assessment — 75% minimum passing score required for ICS-300 certification

Group Exercises

  • Type 3 expanding incident management exercise — teams establish UC, develop objectives, complete Forms 215 and 215A, assemble and brief the IAP, manage resources across two operational periods, coordinate with a simulated EOC, and conduct the after-action review — reviewed against NIMS ICS-300 competency criteria

  • Expanding incident failure analysis exercise — groups apply RCA to a presented multi-operational-period incident where UC broke down, the IAP was not developed, and resource freelancing occurred — identifying command, planning, and coordination root causes and developing a corrective action plan for the emergency response program

Gained Core Technical Skills

  • Ability to describe how the NIMS Command and Management component supports expanding incident management and implement ICS for a Type 3 multi-operational-period incident

  • Proficiency in establishing Unified Command for multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional incidents — including UC membership, single OSC designation, and consensus objective development

  • Competency in applying Command and General Staff roles during expanding incidents — Operations, Planning, Logistics, Finance/Administration, Branch Director, Division Supervisor, and Group Supervisor

  • Skill in completing ICS Form 215: Operational Planning Worksheet for each Division and Group across multiple operational periods

  • Ability to complete ICS Form 215A: Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis identifying hazards, risk ratings, and mitigations for each tactical assignment

  • Proficiency in assembling a complete multi-operational-period written IAP using ICS Forms 202, 203, 204, 205, 205A, 206, 207, and 208

  • Competency in managing resources across multiple operational periods — ordering, typing, tracking, staging, and demobilization planning per ICS Form 221

  • Skill in coordinating between the ICP and EOC — situation reporting, resource request fulfillment, and policy escalation

  • Ability to apply HIRARC within the ICS Safety Officer function, conduct after-action reviews applying RCA, and apply PDCA to emergency response capability improvement per ISO 45001:2018

Services Geographical Coverage

In Tamkene Training Center or at our client's facility (On-Site), Covering All Saudi Arabia Cities and Locations:


Targeted Audience

  • Command and General Staff candidates — Operations, Planning, Logistics, and Finance/Administration Section Chiefs — who may serve in these roles during Type 3 expanding incidents

  • Division and Group Supervisors and Branch Directors who manage resources across geographic areas or functional assignments during large-scale incidents

  • HSE managers and emergency response coordinators who may serve as Safety Officer, Liaison Officer, or Public Information Officer during multi-agency expanding incidents

  • Unit Leaders in the Planning, Logistics, and Finance sections who require intermediate ICS competency to fulfill their roles during expanding incident management

  • Incident Management Team — IMT — candidates at Type 3 level who require ICS-300 as a mandatory prerequisite for position-specific qualification

  • Any professional who may assume a Command or General Staff role, Division/Group supervision, or Branch Director function during a Type 3 or expanding incident and requires ICS-300 as a prerequisite for ICS-400

Practical Assessment

  • ICS Form 215 exercise — completing a full Operational Planning Worksheet for a presented expanding incident scenario including work assignments, resource requirements, reporting locations, and special instructions for each Division and Group

  • ICS Form 215A exercise — completing a full Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis for the Form 215 scenario identifying hazards, risk ratings, mitigation measures, and residual risk for each tactical assignment

  • Expanding incident IAP exercise — assembling a complete multi-operational-period IAP using ICS Forms 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, and 208 for a presented Type 3 incident scenario and conducting the operational period briefing

Knowledge Assessment

  • Expanding incident and UC questions — Type 3 incident definition, UC membership criteria, single OSC under UC, and multi-jurisdictional versus single-jurisdiction UC distinction

  • Planning process and IAP questions — Planning P cycle frequency for expanding incidents, Form 215 developer, Form 215A developer, and mandatory written IAP trigger

  • General Staff and resource management questions — Branch Director span of control trigger, Division versus Group distinction, resource status three categories, and Demobilization Unit Leader's primary product

  • EOC and documentation questions — EOC versus IC operational authority distinction, JIC location within MACS, ICS Form 207 purpose, and after-action review NIMS corrective action obligation

Why Choose This Course

  • Aligned with FEMA ICS-300, NIMS 2017 Doctrine, developed with NWCG, USDA, EPA, and USCG — and integrated with ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 9001

  • Satisfies the NIMS Baseline Training ICS-300 requirement and provides the mandatory prerequisite for ICS-400 and all NIMS All-Hazards Command and General Staff position-specific courses

  • ICS Forms 215 and 215A are practiced and assessed as operational competencies — not reviewed as awareness topics

  • UC establishment and multi-jurisdictional coordination are applied in scenario exercises directly relevant to GCC multi-agency industrial emergency response

  • Multi-operational-period IAP development — the most demanding ICS-300 competency — is practiced across both exercise days with after-action review debrief

  • Incorporates Middle East ICS-300 challenges including government civil defense and private sector UC coordination during major GCC petrochemical and industrial incidents and sustaining IAP discipline across multiple operational periods under organizational pressure

Note: This course outline, including specific topics, modules, and duration, can be customized based on the specific needs and requirements of the client.

IPAF - 1a Static Vertical Personnel Platform Operator Training Course
IPAF - 1a Static Vertical Personnel Platform Operator
Learn More
SASO Approved - Motor Grader Operator Training Course
SASO - Motor Graders Operator
Learn More
SASO & LEEA - Forklift Operator Training Course
SASO & LEEA - Forklift Operator
Learn More
Fire Warden Training Course
Fire Warden
Learn More

Recommended Courses

All Courses
FAQ: Is Tamkene Approved by Aramco? Yes
Is Tamkene approved by Aramco? Yes
Learn More
FAQ: Is Tamkene Approved by TVTC? Yes, Read More
Is Tamkene approved locally by TVTC? Yes
Learn More
FAQ: Training Services | Covering all Saudi Arabia cities
Does Tamkene training services covers all Saudi Arabia cities? Yes we do
Learn More
FAQ: How to verify a certificate or a card from Tamkene?
How to verify a certificate or a card from Tamkene?
Learn More

Suggested Questions

All FAQs
Confined Space Entry & Rescue
Dalal AlSaeed

The training I received from Tamkene was truly exceptional.

Dalal AlSaeed

SASO & LEEA - RIGGER 1
Wafi AlZayer

Choosing Tamkene for our professional development was a game-changer.

Wafi AlZayer

Fire Fighting
Saad AlMisehal

Tamkene delivered quality training with a strong focus on standards. The organization and delivery exceeded our expectations.

Saad AlMisehal

Testimonial

Client Testimonials 

bottom of page