ACCREDITATIONS
Clients
RESULTS-ORITNTED Training Description
Course Duration
5 Days
Training Delivery Method
Classroom (Instructor-Led) or Online (Instructor-Led)
Instructors Languages
English / Arabic / Urdu / Hindi / Pashto
Certification Provider
Tamkene Saudi Training Center - Approved by TVTC (Technical and Vocational Training Corporation)
Certificate Validity
2 Years (Extendable with additional training hours)
Course Average Passing Rate
97%
Competency Assessment Criteria
Practical Assessment and Knowledge Assessment
Post Training Reporting
Post Training Report + Candidate(s) Training Evaluation Forms
Training Design Methodology
ADDIE Training Design Methodology
Certificate of Successful Completion
Certification is provided upon successful completion. The certificate can be verified through a QR-Code system.
Course Overview
Most organizations have a strategy. Few execute it. The gap between a well-articulated strategic plan and measurable organizational performance is not a problem of ambition — it is a problem of translation. A strategy that lives in a document, disconnected from annual budgets, operational priorities, individual objectives, and performance reviews, produces no competitive advantage. The organizations that consistently outperform their competitors are those where strategy is not an annual event but a living management system — continuously monitored, regularly challenged, and systematically translated into every level of the organization's decision-making.
This training course develops comprehensive strategic planning competency across the full strategy lifecycle — from environmental scanning and competitive analysis through strategic option generation, direction setting, execution planning, performance management, and strategic review. The course integrates the most widely applied strategic planning frameworks: SWOT Analysis — Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats; PESTLE Analysis — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental; Porter's Five Forces competitive analysis developed by Michael E. Porter; Ansoff Matrix for growth strategy; BCG Growth-Share Matrix for portfolio management; McKinsey 7S Framework for organizational alignment; Balanced Scorecard — BSC developed by Kaplan and Norton for strategy execution and performance measurement; OKR — Objectives and Key Results for goal alignment; Hoshin Kanri policy deployment; and Blue Ocean Strategy for market creation. Strategy execution integrates PDCA — Plan-Do-Check-Act and Root Cause Analysis — RCA for strategy review and corrective action. The course is aligned with ISO 9001:2015: Quality Management Systems Clause 4 (organizational context) and Clause 6 (planning) for strategy integration with the quality management system.
Key Learning Objectives
Apply PESTLE and Porter's Five Forces to analyze the external environment and competitive landscape
Apply SWOT Analysis and McKinsey 7S Framework to assess internal organizational capability
Generate strategic options using Ansoff Matrix, BCG Matrix, and Blue Ocean Strategy
Develop organizational mission, vision, and values as the strategic direction foundation
Apply the Balanced Scorecard and strategy map to translate strategy into measurable objectives
Apply OKR — Objectives and Key Results to cascade strategy to team and individual level
Apply Hoshin Kanri policy deployment to align organizational priorities across all levels
Conduct scenario planning to develop strategy resilient to environmental uncertainty
Develop a strategic execution plan with milestones, KPIs, ownership, and review cycles
Apply PDCA and RCA to strategic review and course correction
Course Outline
Day 1 — Strategic Thinking and External Environment Analysis
1. Introduction to Strategic Planning
1.1 Strategy Fundamentals
Strategy definition — making deliberate choices about where to compete and how to win
Strategic planning versus operational planning — strategy sets direction; operations deliver it
The strategy execution gap — why most strategies fail at implementation, not formulation
Strategy as a management system — not an annual event but a continuous performance discipline
Strategic planning process — environment scan, direction setting, option generation, execution, and review
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4 — understanding the organizational context as the foundation of strategic planning
1.2 Levels of Strategy
Corporate strategy — what businesses to be in and how to allocate capital across the portfolio
Business unit strategy — how to compete within a defined market or industry
Functional strategy — how operations, marketing, HR, and finance support the business strategy
Strategy cascade — each level must align with and support the level above
Strategic horizon — short-term (1 year), medium-term (3 years), and long-term (5–10 years) planning cycles
2. PESTLE Analysis — External Environment Scanning
PESTLE Analysis — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental — scanning macro-environmental forces
Political factors — government stability, trade policy, taxation, and regulatory direction
Economic factors — GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, and labour costs
Social factors — demographic trends, cultural shifts, workforce expectations, and consumer behaviour
Technological factors — emerging technologies, digital disruption, and automation impact
Legal factors — employment law, health and safety regulation, and industry-specific compliance requirements
Environmental factors — climate change, sustainability regulation, carbon commitments, and resource scarcity
PESTLE in GCC context — Vision 2030, diversification mandates, and localization requirements
Translating PESTLE findings into strategic implications — identifying the threats and opportunities each factor creates
3. Porter's Five Forces — Competitive Analysis
Porter's Five Forces — developed by Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business School — the dominant competitive analysis framework
Force 1 — Threat of new entrants: barriers to entry, capital requirements, and brand loyalty
Force 2 — Bargaining power of suppliers: supplier concentration, switching costs, and input criticality
Force 3 — Bargaining power of buyers: buyer concentration, price sensitivity, and switching costs
Force 4 — Threat of substitute products: availability of alternatives and relative price-performance
Force 5 — Competitive rivalry: number of competitors, industry growth rate, and exit barriers
Five Forces output — industry attractiveness rating and the strategic implications for positioning
Five Forces limitations — point-in-time analysis requiring regular refresh as market conditions evolve
4. SWOT Analysis and Internal Assessment
4.1 SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis — Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats — integrating internal and external findings
Strengths — internal capabilities that provide competitive advantage
Weaknesses — internal capability gaps that limit competitiveness
Opportunities — external factors the organization can exploit to grow
Threats — external factors that could harm organizational performance or competitive position
TOWS Matrix — generating strategic options by combining SWOT quadrants — SO, ST, WO, and WT strategies
SWOT quality — specific, evidence-based findings outperform generic statements that apply to any organization
4.2 McKinsey 7S Framework
McKinsey 7S Framework — assessing seven interdependent organizational elements for strategic alignment
Strategy — the organizational plan for competitive success
Structure — how the organization is divided and coordinated
Systems — the processes and procedures that govern daily operations
Shared Values — the core beliefs and culture that guide organizational behavior
Style — the leadership approach of senior management
Staff — the people, their capabilities, and their development
Skills — the core competencies that differentiate the organization
7S alignment — all seven elements must be mutually reinforcing for strategy to execute effectively
Day 2 — Strategic Direction, Options, and Portfolio Management
5. Mission, Vision, and Values
Mission — why the organization exists; the fundamental purpose it serves
Vision — what the organization aspires to become in the long term
Values — the principles that govern how the organization behaves in pursuit of its mission and vision
Mission and vision quality test — specific, aspirational, differentiating, and memorable
Values as strategic constraint — values define what the organization will not do, not just what it will
Communicating mission and vision — the leader's role in embedding direction throughout the organization
Strategic alignment — all organizational objectives must trace back to the mission and vision
6. Strategic Options — Growth and Competitive Strategies
6.1 Ansoff Matrix
Ansoff Matrix — four growth strategies based on product and market combinations
Market Penetration — existing products in existing markets with lower risk and lower return
Product Development — new products for existing markets requiring innovation investment
Market Development — existing products in new markets requiring geographic or segment expansion
Diversification — new products in new markets with highest risk and highest potential return
Risk-return trade-off — the further from the core, the higher the risk and resource requirement
6.2 Porter's Generic Strategies and Blue Ocean
Porter's Generic Strategies — Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus
Cost Leadership — competing on lowest total cost in the market
Differentiation — competing on unique attributes that justify a price premium
Focus — targeting a narrow segment with either cost or differentiation advantage
Blue Ocean Strategy — creating uncontested market space by making competition irrelevant
Value Innovation — simultaneously pursuing differentiation and low cost to create new demand
Four Actions Framework — Eliminate, Reduce, Raise, and Create — for Blue Ocean strategy design
7. Portfolio Management — BCG Matrix and Strategic Investment
BCG Growth-Share Matrix — developed by Boston Consulting Group — classifying business units by market share and growth
Stars — high growth, high share — invest to maintain position and build future cash generation
Cash Cows — low growth, high share — harvest for cash to fund Stars and Question Marks
Question Marks — high growth, low share — selectively invest or divest based on competitive potential
Dogs — low growth, low share — divest or reposition to free resources for higher-value units
Portfolio balance — a healthy portfolio has sufficient Cash Cows to fund Stars and promising Question Marks
Capital allocation discipline — portfolio analysis must drive investment decisions, not historical budgets
BCG Matrix limitations — market share and growth alone do not capture full strategic value
8. Scenario Planning and Strategic Risk
Scenario planning — developing multiple plausible futures and strategy responses for each
Scenario development process — identify key uncertainties, develop axes, build scenario narratives
Two-axis scenario matrix — four scenarios from two independent and uncertain driving forces
Scenario implications — identifying which strategic options perform well across multiple scenarios
Robust strategy — a strategy that delivers acceptable outcomes across all plausible scenarios
Strategic risk register — documenting the threats identified in PESTLE, Five Forces, and scenario analysis
Risk appetite — the level of strategic risk the organization is prepared to accept in pursuit of its objectives
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.1 — addressing risks and opportunities as a formal planning obligation
Day 3 — Strategy Execution, Balanced Scorecard, and OKR
9. Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps
9.1 Balanced Scorecard Framework
Balanced Scorecard — BSC — developed by Kaplan and Norton — translating strategy into measurable objectives across four perspectives
Financial Perspective — revenue growth, profitability, return on capital, and cost efficiency objectives
Customer Perspective — customer satisfaction, retention, acquisition, and market share objectives
Internal Process Perspective — operational efficiency, quality, innovation, and process improvement objectives
Learning and Growth Perspective — workforce capability, technology, and culture objectives
Cause-and-effect logic — Learning and Growth drives Internal Process, which drives Customer, which drives Financial
Lag indicators — outcomes that measure what has already happened
Lead indicators — drivers that predict future performance
9.2 Strategy Maps
Strategy map — a one-page visual showing cause-and-effect linkages between BSC objectives
Strategy map construction — building from Learning and Growth upward through each BSC perspective
Strategic theme — a cluster of related BSC objectives addressing a defined strategic priority
Strategy map communication — the most powerful tool for explaining strategy to the entire organization
Linking BSC to budget — the BSC translates strategy into resource requirements and annual budget allocations
10. OKR — Objectives and Key Results
OKR — Objectives and Key Results — goal-setting framework developed at Intel, popularized by Google
Objective — an ambitious, qualitative, inspiring goal that states what the organization wants to achieve
Key Results — three to five measurable, time-bound outcomes that define success for the Objective
OKR quality — a good Key Result is measurable, achievable, and directly signals progress toward the Objective
OKR cascade — company OKRs cascade to department OKRs, then to team and individual OKRs
OKR cycle — quarterly review cycle with 70% achievement as the target — 100% signals insufficient ambition
OKR versus BSC — OKRs are agile and aspirational; BSC is comprehensive and cause-and-effect based — used together for maximum effect
OKR alignment review — weekly check-in and quarterly OKR review to assess progress and obstacles
11. Hoshin Kanri — Policy Deployment
Hoshin Kanri — Japanese policy deployment methodology aligning organizational priorities from senior leadership to frontline
Catchball process — iterative top-down and bottom-up dialogue to align priorities across all levels
X-Matrix — the Hoshin Kanri planning tool linking breakthrough objectives, annual priorities, improvement projects, and metrics
Breakthrough objectives — the three to five multi-year priorities that define the organization's strategic focus
Annual priorities — the specific objectives for the current year that advance the breakthrough objectives
Improvement projects — the specific initiatives assigned to functional teams to deliver annual priorities
Hoshin review — monthly review of Hoshin performance against the X-Matrix metrics
Hoshin versus BSC — Hoshin deploys the annual plan; BSC measures multi-year strategic performance
Day 4 — Strategy Execution Management and Change Leadership
12. Strategic Execution Planning
12.1 Strategic Initiative Management
Strategic initiative — a time-limited project that closes the gap between current performance and strategic objective
Initiative prioritization — selecting initiatives by strategic impact, resource requirement, and risk
Initiative charter — defining scope, owner, timeline, budget, KPIs, and success criteria for each initiative
Initiative portfolio management — tracking all strategic initiatives on a consolidated strategic dashboard
Resource allocation — assigning financial and human resources to strategic initiatives before the budget year begins
12.2 Strategy Execution Governance
Strategy management office — the function responsible for maintaining the strategic planning cycle
Strategic review cadence — monthly operational review, quarterly strategy review, and annual strategic planning cycle
Strategy review agenda — KPI performance, initiative progress, emerging risks, and resource reallocation decisions
Escalation process — defining when performance gaps require executive intervention versus functional correction
Strategy communication — consistent messaging from leadership on strategic priorities and progress
13. Change Management in Strategy Execution
Strategy execution requires behavior change — new strategies demand new ways of working
Kotter's 8-Step Change Model — Create Urgency, Build Coalition, Form Vision, Communicate, Empower, Generate Wins, Consolidate, and Anchor
Resistance to strategic change — identifying sources of resistance and designing engagement strategies
Culture as a strategic enabler or barrier — the 7S Shared Values element determines execution capacity
Stakeholder mapping — identifying supporters, neutrals, and resisters for each strategic initiative
Leadership alignment — senior leadership team must visibly and consistently model the new strategic direction
Quick wins — early visible results build momentum and reduce resistance to strategic change
14. Strategic KPI Development and Dashboard Design
KPI selection criteria — directly linked to a strategic objective, measurable, owned, and actionable
KPI hierarchy — organizational KPIs cascade to departmental KPIs and individual performance metrics
SMART KPI targets — specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound
Baseline establishment — measuring current performance before setting the target
Strategic dashboard design — displaying the most critical KPIs with trend, target, and variance at a glance
RAG status — Red, Amber, Green — for rapid performance status communication in strategy reviews
KPI review discipline — consistent review of the same KPI set prevents metric switching to avoid accountability
Linking KPIs to rewards — connecting individual performance evaluation to strategic KPI achievement
Day 5 — Strategy Review, HSE Integration, and Case Studies
15. Strategic Review and Course Correction
15.1 Strategy Performance Review
Applying PDCA — Plan-Do-Check-Act to the strategic management cycle
Check phase — comparing actual strategic performance against BSC objectives and OKR targets
Performance gap analysis — quantifying the gap between current and target performance for each strategic objective
Applying RCA — Root Cause Analysis to strategic underperformance — identifying strategic, operational, and execution root causes
Strategic pivot decision — determining when performance gaps require strategy revision versus execution improvement
15.2 Strategy Adaptation
Strategy revision triggers — market disruption, competitive move, technology shift, or sustained performance gap
Emergent strategy — recognizing and incorporating unplanned strategic opportunities as they appear
Annual strategic planning refresh — updating PESTLE, Five Forces, SWOT, and BSC objectives each year
Strategic learning — capturing lessons from strategy execution to improve the next planning cycle
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 9.3 management review — incorporating strategic performance into the formal management review agenda
16. HSE and Quality Integration in Strategic Planning
HSE as a strategic objective — integrating safety and environmental performance into the BSC Learning and Growth and Internal Process perspectives
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1 — external and internal context analysis as the quality-aligned equivalent of PESTLE and SWOT
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.1 — risk and opportunity planning as the quality-aligned equivalent of strategic risk management
Strategic sustainability — integrating environmental and social governance — ESG — into the strategic planning process
GCC Vision alignment — integrating national Vision 2030 and sustainability commitments into organizational strategy
Applying PDCA to HSE strategic objectives — Plan HSE targets, Do — implement programs, Check — measure KPIs, Act — correct underperformance
17. Case Studies and Group Discussions
Case studies from strategic planning successes and failures in Middle East oil and gas, diversification, and private sector development contexts including organizations that developed strong strategies but failed at execution, organizations that used PESTLE to identify GCC Vision-driven opportunities, and organizations that applied BSC to drive measurable strategic performance improvement — and the importance of strategic planning competency in organizational leadership
Group discussion on strategic planning challenges in regional environments including adapting global strategic frameworks to GCC market dynamics, managing strategy execution in organizations with hierarchical decision-making structures, and aligning organizational strategy with national Vision 2030 and economic diversification priorities across Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar
Integrated strategic planning workshop — teams complete a full strategic planning exercise for a presented organizational scenario: PESTLE scan, Five Forces analysis, SWOT, TOWS strategy options, mission and vision statement, BSC with strategy map, OKR set, and strategic initiative charter — presented for facilitator and peer review
Day 1 — Strategic Thinking and External Environment Analysis
1. Introduction to Strategic Planning
1.1 Strategy Fundamentals
Strategy definition — making deliberate choices about where to compete and how to win
Strategic planning versus operational planning — strategy sets direction; operations deliver it
The strategy execution gap — why most strategies fail at implementation, not formulation
Strategy as a management system — not an annual event but a continuous performance discipline
Strategic planning process — environment scan, direction setting, option generation, execution, and review
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4 — understanding the organizational context as the foundation of strategic planning
1.2 Levels of Strategy
Corporate strategy — what businesses to be in and how to allocate capital across the portfolio
Business unit strategy — how to compete within a defined market or industry
Functional strategy — how operations, marketing, HR, and finance support the business strategy
Strategy cascade — each level must align with and support the level above
Strategic horizon — short-term (1 year), medium-term (3 years), and long-term (5–10 years) planning cycles
2. PESTLE Analysis — External Environment Scanning
PESTLE Analysis — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental — scanning macro-environmental forces
Political factors — government stability, trade policy, taxation, and regulatory direction
Economic factors — GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, and labour costs
Social factors — demographic trends, cultural shifts, workforce expectations, and consumer behaviour
Technological factors — emerging technologies, digital disruption, and automation impact
Legal factors — employment law, health and safety regulation, and industry-specific compliance requirements
Environmental factors — climate change, sustainability regulation, carbon commitments, and resource scarcity
PESTLE in GCC context — Vision 2030, diversification mandates, and localization requirements
Translating PESTLE findings into strategic implications — identifying the threats and opportunities each factor creates
3. Porter's Five Forces — Competitive Analysis
Porter's Five Forces — developed by Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business School — the dominant competitive analysis framework
Force 1 — Threat of new entrants: barriers to entry, capital requirements, and brand loyalty
Force 2 — Bargaining power of suppliers: supplier concentration, switching costs, and input criticality
Force 3 — Bargaining power of buyers: buyer concentration, price sensitivity, and switching costs
Force 4 — Threat of substitute products: availability of alternatives and relative price-performance
Force 5 — Competitive rivalry: number of competitors, industry growth rate, and exit barriers
Five Forces output — industry attractiveness rating and the strategic implications for positioning
Five Forces limitations — point-in-time analysis requiring regular refresh as market conditions evolve
4. SWOT Analysis and Internal Assessment
4.1 SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis — Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats — integrating internal and external findings
Strengths — internal capabilities that provide competitive advantage
Weaknesses — internal capability gaps that limit competitiveness
Opportunities — external factors the organization can exploit to grow
Threats — external factors that could harm organizational performance or competitive position
TOWS Matrix — generating strategic options by combining SWOT quadrants — SO, ST, WO, and WT strategies
SWOT quality — specific, evidence-based findings outperform generic statements that apply to any organization
4.2 McKinsey 7S Framework
McKinsey 7S Framework — assessing seven interdependent organizational elements for strategic alignment
Strategy — the organizational plan for competitive success
Structure — how the organization is divided and coordinated
Systems — the processes and procedures that govern daily operations
Shared Values — the core beliefs and culture that guide organizational behavior
Style — the leadership approach of senior management
Staff — the people, their capabilities, and their development
Skills — the core competencies that differentiate the organization
7S alignment — all seven elements must be mutually reinforcing for strategy to execute effectively
Day 2 — Strategic Direction, Options, and Portfolio Management
5. Mission, Vision, and Values
Mission — why the organization exists; the fundamental purpose it serves
Vision — what the organization aspires to become in the long term
Values — the principles that govern how the organization behaves in pursuit of its mission and vision
Mission and vision quality test — specific, aspirational, differentiating, and memorable
Values as strategic constraint — values define what the organization will not do, not just what it will
Communicating mission and vision — the leader's role in embedding direction throughout the organization
Strategic alignment — all organizational objectives must trace back to the mission and vision
6. Strategic Options — Growth and Competitive Strategies
6.1 Ansoff Matrix
Ansoff Matrix — four growth strategies based on product and market combinations
Market Penetration — existing products in existing markets with lower risk and lower return
Product Development — new products for existing markets requiring innovation investment
Market Development — existing products in new markets requiring geographic or segment expansion
Diversification — new products in new markets with highest risk and highest potential return
Risk-return trade-off — the further from the core, the higher the risk and resource requirement
6.2 Porter's Generic Strategies and Blue Ocean
Porter's Generic Strategies — Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus
Cost Leadership — competing on lowest total cost in the market
Differentiation — competing on unique attributes that justify a price premium
Focus — targeting a narrow segment with either cost or differentiation advantage
Blue Ocean Strategy — creating uncontested market space by making competition irrelevant
Value Innovation — simultaneously pursuing differentiation and low cost to create new demand
Four Actions Framework — Eliminate, Reduce, Raise, and Create — for Blue Ocean strategy design
7. Portfolio Management — BCG Matrix and Strategic Investment
BCG Growth-Share Matrix — developed by Boston Consulting Group — classifying business units by market share and growth
Stars — high growth, high share — invest to maintain position and build future cash generation
Cash Cows — low growth, high share — harvest for cash to fund Stars and Question Marks
Question Marks — high growth, low share — selectively invest or divest based on competitive potential
Dogs — low growth, low share — divest or reposition to free resources for higher-value units
Portfolio balance — a healthy portfolio has sufficient Cash Cows to fund Stars and promising Question Marks
Capital allocation discipline — portfolio analysis must drive investment decisions, not historical budgets
BCG Matrix limitations — market share and growth alone do not capture full strategic value
8. Scenario Planning and Strategic Risk
Scenario planning — developing multiple plausible futures and strategy responses for each
Scenario development process — identify key uncertainties, develop axes, build scenario narratives
Two-axis scenario matrix — four scenarios from two independent and uncertain driving forces
Scenario implications — identifying which strategic options perform well across multiple scenarios
Robust strategy — a strategy that delivers acceptable outcomes across all plausible scenarios
Strategic risk register — documenting the threats identified in PESTLE, Five Forces, and scenario analysis
Risk appetite — the level of strategic risk the organization is prepared to accept in pursuit of its objectives
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.1 — addressing risks and opportunities as a formal planning obligation
Day 3 — Strategy Execution, Balanced Scorecard, and OKR
9. Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps
9.1 Balanced Scorecard Framework
Balanced Scorecard — BSC — developed by Kaplan and Norton — translating strategy into measurable objectives across four perspectives
Financial Perspective — revenue growth, profitability, return on capital, and cost efficiency objectives
Customer Perspective — customer satisfaction, retention, acquisition, and market share objectives
Internal Process Perspective — operational efficiency, quality, innovation, and process improvement objectives
Learning and Growth Perspective — workforce capability, technology, and culture objectives
Cause-and-effect logic — Learning and Growth drives Internal Process, which drives Customer, which drives Financial
Lag indicators — outcomes that measure what has already happened
Lead indicators — drivers that predict future performance
9.2 Strategy Maps
Strategy map — a one-page visual showing cause-and-effect linkages between BSC objectives
Strategy map construction — building from Learning and Growth upward through each BSC perspective
Strategic theme — a cluster of related BSC objectives addressing a defined strategic priority
Strategy map communication — the most powerful tool for explaining strategy to the entire organization
Linking BSC to budget — the BSC translates strategy into resource requirements and annual budget allocations
10. OKR — Objectives and Key Results
OKR — Objectives and Key Results — goal-setting framework developed at Intel, popularized by Google
Objective — an ambitious, qualitative, inspiring goal that states what the organization wants to achieve
Key Results — three to five measurable, time-bound outcomes that define success for the Objective
OKR quality — a good Key Result is measurable, achievable, and directly signals progress toward the Objective
OKR cascade — company OKRs cascade to department OKRs, then to team and individual OKRs
OKR cycle — quarterly review cycle with 70% achievement as the target — 100% signals insufficient ambition
OKR versus BSC — OKRs are agile and aspirational; BSC is comprehensive and cause-and-effect based — used together for maximum effect
OKR alignment review — weekly check-in and quarterly OKR review to assess progress and obstacles
11. Hoshin Kanri — Policy Deployment
Hoshin Kanri — Japanese policy deployment methodology aligning organizational priorities from senior leadership to frontline
Catchball process — iterative top-down and bottom-up dialogue to align priorities across all levels
X-Matrix — the Hoshin Kanri planning tool linking breakthrough objectives, annual priorities, improvement projects, and metrics
Breakthrough objectives — the three to five multi-year priorities that define the organization's strategic focus
Annual priorities — the specific objectives for the current year that advance the breakthrough objectives
Improvement projects — the specific initiatives assigned to functional teams to deliver annual priorities
Hoshin review — monthly review of Hoshin performance against the X-Matrix metrics
Hoshin versus BSC — Hoshin deploys the annual plan; BSC measures multi-year strategic performance
Day 4 — Strategy Execution Management and Change Leadership
12. Strategic Execution Planning
12.1 Strategic Initiative Management
Strategic initiative — a time-limited project that closes the gap between current performance and strategic objective
Initiative prioritization — selecting initiatives by strategic impact, resource requirement, and risk
Initiative charter — defining scope, owner, timeline, budget, KPIs, and success criteria for each initiative
Initiative portfolio management — tracking all strategic initiatives on a consolidated strategic dashboard
Resource allocation — assigning financial and human resources to strategic initiatives before the budget year begins
12.2 Strategy Execution Governance
Strategy management office — the function responsible for maintaining the strategic planning cycle
Strategic review cadence — monthly operational review, quarterly strategy review, and annual strategic planning cycle
Strategy review agenda — KPI performance, initiative progress, emerging risks, and resource reallocation decisions
Escalation process — defining when performance gaps require executive intervention versus functional correction
Strategy communication — consistent messaging from leadership on strategic priorities and progress
13. Change Management in Strategy Execution
Strategy execution requires behavior change — new strategies demand new ways of working
Kotter's 8-Step Change Model — Create Urgency, Build Coalition, Form Vision, Communicate, Empower, Generate Wins, Consolidate, and Anchor
Resistance to strategic change — identifying sources of resistance and designing engagement strategies
Culture as a strategic enabler or barrier — the 7S Shared Values element determines execution capacity
Stakeholder mapping — identifying supporters, neutrals, and resisters for each strategic initiative
Leadership alignment — senior leadership team must visibly and consistently model the new strategic direction
Quick wins — early visible results build momentum and reduce resistance to strategic change
14. Strategic KPI Development and Dashboard Design
KPI selection criteria — directly linked to a strategic objective, measurable, owned, and actionable
KPI hierarchy — organizational KPIs cascade to departmental KPIs and individual performance metrics
SMART KPI targets — specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound
Baseline establishment — measuring current performance before setting the target
Strategic dashboard design — displaying the most critical KPIs with trend, target, and variance at a glance
RAG status — Red, Amber, Green — for rapid performance status communication in strategy reviews
KPI review discipline — consistent review of the same KPI set prevents metric switching to avoid accountability
Linking KPIs to rewards — connecting individual performance evaluation to strategic KPI achievement
Day 5 — Strategy Review, HSE Integration, and Case Studies
15. Strategic Review and Course Correction
15.1 Strategy Performance Review
Applying PDCA — Plan-Do-Check-Act to the strategic management cycle
Check phase — comparing actual strategic performance against BSC objectives and OKR targets
Performance gap analysis — quantifying the gap between current and target performance for each strategic objective
Applying RCA — Root Cause Analysis to strategic underperformance — identifying strategic, operational, and execution root causes
Strategic pivot decision — determining when performance gaps require strategy revision versus execution improvement
15.2 Strategy Adaptation
Strategy revision triggers — market disruption, competitive move, technology shift, or sustained performance gap
Emergent strategy — recognizing and incorporating unplanned strategic opportunities as they appear
Annual strategic planning refresh — updating PESTLE, Five Forces, SWOT, and BSC objectives each year
Strategic learning — capturing lessons from strategy execution to improve the next planning cycle
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 9.3 management review — incorporating strategic performance into the formal management review agenda
16. HSE and Quality Integration in Strategic Planning
HSE as a strategic objective — integrating safety and environmental performance into the BSC Learning and Growth and Internal Process perspectives
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1 — external and internal context analysis as the quality-aligned equivalent of PESTLE and SWOT
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.1 — risk and opportunity planning as the quality-aligned equivalent of strategic risk management
Strategic sustainability — integrating environmental and social governance — ESG — into the strategic planning process
GCC Vision alignment — integrating national Vision 2030 and sustainability commitments into organizational strategy
Applying PDCA to HSE strategic objectives — Plan HSE targets, Do — implement programs, Check — measure KPIs, Act — correct underperformance
17. Case Studies and Group Discussions
Case studies from strategic planning successes and failures in Middle East oil and gas, diversification, and private sector development contexts including organizations that developed strong strategies but failed at execution, organizations that used PESTLE to identify GCC Vision-driven opportunities, and organizations that applied BSC to drive measurable strategic performance improvement — and the importance of strategic planning competency in organizational leadership
Group discussion on strategic planning challenges in regional environments including adapting global strategic frameworks to GCC market dynamics, managing strategy execution in organizations with hierarchical decision-making structures, and aligning organizational strategy with national Vision 2030 and economic diversification priorities across Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar
Integrated strategic planning workshop — teams complete a full strategic planning exercise for a presented organizational scenario: PESTLE scan, Five Forces analysis, SWOT, TOWS strategy options, mission and vision statement, BSC with strategy map, OKR set, and strategic initiative charter — presented for facilitator and peer review
Group Exercises
Integrated strategic planning workshop — teams complete a full strategic plan for a presented organizational scenario covering PESTLE, Five Forces, SWOT-TOWS, mission and vision, BSC with strategy map, OKR cascade, Hoshin X-Matrix, scenario planning, and strategic initiative portfolio — presented for facilitator and peer review
Strategy execution failure analysis — groups apply RCA to a presented case where an organization had a strong strategy but failed to execute, identify root causes across leadership alignment, resource allocation, cascade failure, and review discipline, and develop a corrective strategy execution governance plan
Gained Core Technical Skills
Proficiency in applying PESTLE and Porter's Five Forces to assess the macro-environment and competitive landscape — and translating findings into strategic implications
Competency in conducting SWOT Analysis and TOWS Matrix to generate SO, ST, WO, and WT strategic options from integrated internal and external findings
Skill in applying the McKinsey 7S Framework to assess organizational alignment gaps that will constrain strategy execution
Ability to apply Ansoff Matrix, BCG Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy, and Porter's Generic Strategies to select and validate strategic growth and competitive options
Proficiency in developing a Balanced Scorecard with objectives across all four perspectives and a strategy map showing cause-and-effect linkages between strategic objectives
Competency in writing and cascading OKRs from organizational level to department and team level — including quarterly review and 70% achievement target discipline
Skill in applying Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix to deploy breakthrough objectives through annual priorities and improvement projects across the organization
Ability to conduct scenario planning — developing multiple future scenarios, identifying robust strategic options, and building a strategic risk register
Proficiency in applying PDCA and RCA to strategic review — diagnosing execution root causes, making pivot decisions, and driving continual strategic improvement per ISO 9001:2015 Clauses 4, 6, and 9.3
Services Geographical Coverage
In Tamkene Training Center or at our client's facility (On-Site), Covering All Saudi Arabia Cities and Locations:
Targeted Audience
Senior managers and directors responsible for developing, communicating, and executing organizational strategy
CEOs, Managing Directors, and C-suite executives who lead the annual strategic planning cycle and drive organizational direction
Strategy managers and business development professionals responsible for environmental scanning, competitive analysis, and strategic option development
Department heads and functional leaders responsible for translating organizational strategy into departmental objectives and OKRs
Quality managers and management system professionals responsible for integrating strategic planning with ISO 9001:2015 organizational context and planning requirements
Any professional whose role involves formulating, executing, monitoring, or reviewing organizational strategy and who needs a structured, multi-framework strategic planning competency
Practical Assessment
Environmental analysis exercise — completing a PESTLE analysis and Porter's Five Forces assessment for a presented organizational scenario, identifying the top three strategic implications from each, and summarizing findings in a SWOT matrix
BSC and strategy map exercise — developing a Balanced Scorecard with three objectives per perspective and a strategy map showing cause-and-effect linkages for a presented organizational strategy scenario
OKR and strategic initiative exercise — writing three company-level OKRs cascaded to three department-level OKRs, and completing a strategic initiative charter for one key initiative including scope, owner, KPIs, timeline, and budget
Knowledge Assessment
Environmental analysis questions — PESTLE six factor identification, Five Forces five forces with definitions, TOWS Matrix four strategy types, and BCG Matrix four quadrant names and investment implications
Direction and options questions — Ansoff Matrix four growth strategies in sequence of risk, Porter's three Generic Strategies, Blue Ocean Four Actions Framework elements, and McKinsey 7S seven elements
BSC and OKR questions — BSC four perspectives in cause-and-effect sequence, strategy map definition, OKR quarterly achievement target percentage, and Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix four linkages
Execution and review questions — Kotter's 8-Step Model first three steps, PDCA Check phase strategic review application, RCA application to strategic underperformance, and ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1 strategic context equivalent
Why Choose This Course
Integrates ten strategic planning frameworks — SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, Ansoff Matrix, BCG Matrix, McKinsey 7S, Balanced Scorecard, OKR, Hoshin Kanri, and Blue Ocean Strategy — in a single coherent planning program
Covers the complete strategy lifecycle — external scan, internal assessment, direction setting, option generation, portfolio management, execution planning, performance measurement, and strategic review
BSC strategy map construction, OKR cascade, and strategic initiative charter are practiced under assessment conditions
Strategy execution — not strategy formulation — is the course's primary emphasis, reflecting the reality that execution is where most strategies fail
ISO 9001:2015 Clauses 4 and 6 are integrated as the quality management system alignment for strategic planning — developing participants who embed strategy in the management system, not separate from it
Incorporates Middle East strategic planning challenges including GCC Vision 2030 alignment, national diversification mandate integration, and applying global strategic frameworks in hierarchical GCC organizational decision-making cultures
Note: This course outline, including specific topics, modules, and duration, can be customized based on the specific needs and requirements of the client.
Recommended Courses
Suggested Questions

.webp)
The training I received from Tamkene was truly exceptional.
Dalal AlSaeed

.webp)
Choosing Tamkene for our professional development was a game-changer.
Wafi AlZayer

.webp)
Tamkene delivered quality training with a strong focus on standards. The organization and delivery exceeded our expectations.
Saad AlMisehal
Testimonial




































.webp)
.webp)



.webp)

.webp)

